Skip to content
Hykell

AWS Graviton instance types and pricing insights for smarter cloud spending

Your AWS compute bill could drop by 40% tomorrow if you’re running the right workloads on the wrong processors. AWS Graviton instances, powered by custom ARM-based chips, deliver exceptional price-performance ratios that many businesses haven’t fully explored yet.

What are AWS Graviton instances?

AWS Graviton instances run on ARM-based processors designed specifically for cloud workloads, offering a compelling alternative to traditional x86 instances. These processors deliver better energy efficiency and cost savings without sacrificing performance for compatible applications.

Think of Graviton as AWS’s answer to the “why pay more for less?” question that plagues many cloud bills. Unlike off-the-shelf processors, these chips are custom-built for the cloud, eliminating unnecessary features that drive up costs without delivering value.

The Graviton family has evolved through three generations:

Each generation builds upon the previous one, offering progressively better performance per dollar and enhanced energy efficiency. The progression resembles Moore’s Law in action, but focused specifically on cloud economics rather than raw processing power.

An infographic-style illustration showing a comparison between three generations of AWS Graviton processors (Graviton2, Graviton3, Graviton4). Include labeled CPU chips for each generation, arrows indicating improvements in computational performance, memory speed, and energy efficiency. Add icons representing key features such as DDR5 memory, NVMe SSD, and enhanced networking for Graviton4.

Graviton instance types across AWS services

General purpose instances

M8g instances (Graviton4) provide balanced compute, memory, and networking for everyday workloads. These instances excel at:

  • Web servers and application hosting where consistent performance matters
  • Microservices architectures requiring reliable inter-service communication
  • Code repositories and development environments with moderate resource needs
  • Small to medium databases that don’t require specialized memory configurations

M7g instances (Graviton3) offer proven reliability for production workloads requiring consistent performance across multiple resource dimensions. Many organizations start their Graviton journey here due to the balanced resource allocation.

T4g instances (Graviton2) deliver burstable performance for variable workloads at the lowest cost point in the Graviton family. They’re perfect for applications that experience traffic spikes but maintain low baseline usage.

Compute-optimized instances

C8g instances (Graviton4) excel at compute-intensive tasks where processing power is the primary bottleneck:

  • Machine learning inference where model execution speed directly impacts user experience
  • High-performance web servers handling thousands of concurrent requests
  • Gaming servers requiring real-time processing and low latency
  • Batch processing workloads that can leverage ARM’s efficiency gains

C7g instances (Graviton3) have proven their worth in real-world deployments. Hykell’s migration success stories document a client achieving 25% performance improvements with C7g instances for real-time operations, demonstrating that the transition from x86 to ARM often delivers unexpected performance bonuses.

Memory-optimized instances

R7g instances (Graviton3) handle memory-intensive applications effectively:

  • Financial data processing and analytics where large datasets must remain in memory
  • Blockchain transaction processing requiring rapid access to transaction histories
  • Large-scale caching layers that serve as performance buffers
  • In-memory databases optimizing for sub-millisecond query responses

A blockchain company featured in Hykell’s case studies migrated from x86 R5/M5 instances to Graviton R7g instances, reducing costs while maintaining high transaction processing capabilities. The migration proved that even specialized financial applications can benefit from ARM architecture.

Accelerated computing options

Graviton processors also power GPU-enabled instances for machine learning and graphics workloads. While specific GPU configurations vary, these instances combine ARM efficiency with specialized acceleration, creating unique price-performance opportunities for AI inference workloads.

Graviton pricing advantages and cost savings

Real-world cost reductions

The numbers speak clearly: businesses typically save 20-40% on compute costs when migrating compatible workloads to Graviton instances. Here’s what actual migrations have achieved:

  • A financial technology company reduced compute costs by 30% migrating from x86 instances to Graviton R7g instances
  • A consulting firm achieved 22% compute savings by adapting their forecasting models to include Graviton processors
  • Multiple Hykell clients have documented 30% cost reductions while maintaining or improving performance

These aren’t hypothetical savings—they represent actual results from production workloads where businesses made the calculated decision to embrace ARM architecture.

A diagram displaying cost savings from migrating workloads to AWS Graviton instances. Show two sets of cloud servers labeled x86 and Graviton, with arrows illustrating workloads moving from x86 to Graviton. Below the Graviton servers, prominently display a 20-40% cost reduction figure, along with icons for optimized performance, energy efficiency, and supported AWS services such as RDS, ECS, and Lambda.

Performance per dollar metrics

Graviton3 instances deliver 60% better price-performance for compute-heavy tasks compared to equivalent x86 instances. This improvement stems from:

  • ARM architecture’s inherent energy efficiency reducing operational overhead
  • Custom silicon optimized specifically for cloud workloads rather than general computing
  • Better memory bandwidth utilization maximizing data throughput
  • Reduced power consumption translating directly to lower AWS pricing

Comparing Graviton generations

When evaluating Graviton options, understanding generational differences helps optimize both cost and performance:

Graviton3 vs Graviton2:

Graviton4 advantages:

  • DDR5-5600 memory support enabling higher bandwidth applications
  • Enhanced NVMe SSD performance for storage-intensive workloads
  • Elastic Fabric Adapter support for high-performance networking scenarios
  • Optimized for next-generation applications requiring maximum efficiency

The generational improvements follow a clear pattern: each iteration delivers measurable performance gains while maintaining or improving cost efficiency.

Implementation strategies for Graviton adoption

Workload assessment and migration planning

Not every workload benefits equally from Graviton migration. Start by identifying applications that:

  • Run on containerized platforms (Docker, Kubernetes) where architecture abstraction simplifies migration
  • Use interpreted languages (Python, Java, Node.js) with robust ARM support
  • Don’t require x86-specific dependencies or legacy libraries
  • Have predictable or well-understood performance characteristics for accurate comparison

Consider this assessment phase as architectural archaeology—you’re uncovering which applications are truly portable versus those with hidden x86 dependencies.

Testing and validation approach

Successful Graviton implementations follow a structured testing methodology:

  1. Proof of concept: Start with non-critical workloads to validate performance assumptions
  2. Performance benchmarking: Compare Graviton instances against current x86 configurations using real application metrics
  3. Cost modeling: Calculate projected savings including any application modification costs
  4. Gradual rollout: Scale adoption based on testing results and business confidence levels

This approach mirrors how successful organizations handle any major infrastructure change—methodically, with clear success criteria at each stage.

Migration tools and automation

AWS provides several tools to streamline Graviton adoption:

  • AWS Migration Hub: Centralized migration planning and tracking across multiple application components
  • Graviton Ready Program: Pre-validated software and partner solutions reducing compatibility guesswork
  • Container migration tools: For containerized applications running on ECS or EKS

For organizations seeking automated optimization beyond basic migration, services like Hykell can identify Graviton migration opportunities as part of comprehensive cost optimization reviews, eliminating the manual effort required for ongoing optimization.

Graviton compatibility and software support

Native AWS service integration

Many AWS managed services already support Graviton processors natively:

  • Amazon RDS: Database instances with Graviton backing for improved price-performance
  • Amazon ECS: Container orchestration with Graviton task definitions
  • AWS Lambda: Serverless functions optimized for ARM architecture
  • Amazon ElastiCache: Caching services with Graviton instance options

This native integration means you can often switch to Graviton instances without changing application code—AWS handles the architectural differences transparently.

Application compatibility considerations

Most modern applications run seamlessly on Graviton instances, particularly those built with:

  • Cloud-native architectures designed for portability
  • Container-based deployments abstracting hardware dependencies
  • Popular programming languages with mature ARM support
  • Open-source software stacks actively maintained for multiple architectures

Legacy applications requiring x86-specific libraries may need code modifications or may not be suitable for Graviton migration. However, the compatibility surface area continues expanding as ARM adoption grows across the industry.

Monitoring and optimizing Graviton performance

Performance tracking metrics

Monitor these key indicators when running Graviton instances:

  • CPU utilization patterns: ARM processors may show different utilization characteristics compared to x86 baseline measurements
  • Memory access performance: Graviton3’s enhanced memory bandwidth should reflect in application-specific metrics
  • Network throughput: Particularly important for Graviton4 instances with enhanced networking capabilities
  • Application response times: End-user experience validation ensuring performance gains translate to business value

Think of performance monitoring as your early warning system—catching optimization opportunities before they impact user experience.

Cost monitoring and optimization

Regular cost analysis ensures Graviton instances continue delivering expected savings:

  • Compare month-over-month compute costs before and after migration to validate ROI
  • Track reserved instance utilization for Graviton instance families to maximize savings
  • Monitor for right-sizing opportunities as workload patterns evolve over time

Tools like the AWS Cost Optimization Hub can identify additional savings opportunities, though they require manual implementation. Automated solutions can streamline ongoing optimization efforts, ensuring your Graviton investment continues paying dividends.

Common questions about Graviton instances

Are Graviton instances always cheaper? Cost savings depend on workload compatibility and current instance utilization. Compatible workloads typically see 20-40% savings, but applications requiring significant modifications may offset these benefits initially.

How do Graviton instances compare to GPU instances for machine learning? Graviton instances excel at ML inference workloads but aren’t direct replacements for GPU-accelerated training. For inference-heavy applications, Graviton can offer better price-performance than GPU instances, especially for models that don’t require specialized tensor operations.

What’s the migration effort for existing applications? Container-based applications often migrate with minimal changes, sometimes requiring only configuration updates. Legacy applications may require recompilation or architectural modifications depending on their x86 dependencies.

Do Graviton instances support all AWS features? Most AWS features work identically on Graviton instances. Some specialized features or third-party software may have ARM compatibility requirements worth verifying during your assessment phase.

AWS Graviton instances represent a compelling opportunity to reduce cloud costs while maintaining or improving performance. The key lies in identifying suitable workloads, conducting thorough testing, and implementing systematic migration strategies. For businesses seeking to maximize these benefits without extensive internal engineering effort, partnering with cloud optimization specialists can accelerate both adoption and ongoing cost management.